🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart atomic talks with Washington as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared new appeals had been made by go-betweens to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Route

Araghchi is walking a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be acting from a stance of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more resilient in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the main reason of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Prior Discussions Abruptly Concluded

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile end on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with Donald Trump asserting the facilities had been destroyed. Following this, Western states employed their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Officials claimed on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the deal to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Position

Iran's diplomats declared the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be revived in some form if talks reopen.

Trump in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran desired to resume discussions, but confidentially Tehran representatives say they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states negotiations is not part of a show.

Political Position

In his remarks to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of international law, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement showed the dispute could not be settled by military means. He stated the strikes began with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were mounted with complete American awareness and collaboration, making confidence challenging to reestablish.

Diplomacy Remains the Ultimate Resolution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had always tried to dictate their will during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be active and continues the primary answer to settle disagreements, but its standards, regulations and principles must be respected."

"If they talk to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will obtain a answer in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the conflict of restoration and rebuilding, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if eliminated, will be restored; what is essential is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but did not succeed to shatter. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more united, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."